If you’re a golfer – wait, scratch that – if you’re a human, you’ve heard the news: After 2 incredibly contentious years, complete with lawsuits, insults and hostilities, the PGA and LIV Golf have essentially merged. I remember where I was when JFK was shot, and now I’ll remember where I was when I heard this shocking news.

The framework of the deal was published recently. One of the key factors of the agreement is that all pending lawsuits between the PGA and LIV will be terminated.  Some are saying there was so much dirty laundry in both camps that settling was just a way to stop the legal discovery.

But settling isn’t necessarily shocking news – what’s shocking is that usually after adversaries settle, they don’t merge.  The PGA & LIV hated each other, sued each other, publicly bashed each other, now they’re getting married? It’s like Frazier and Ali kissing and making up. It’s like UNC rooting for Duke. Not a sports fan? It’s Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote becoming lovers.

A bunch of people said they’ll never watch the PGA again, but how can I do that? Watching golf is what I do! But I’ll be darned if I know what to think about all of this.

Full disclosure, I’m a Lebanese-American, albeit second generation, but still, I’m absolutely not going to “Arab-bash.” But even I know that Arab countries have high levels of antisemitism, misogyny and homophobia. And Saudi Arabia, which follows Sharia law, tops the list. Can it be a good thing that the PGA has merged with them?

And are we supposed to be okay with a deal that happened after the Saudis poached the PGA’s assets (their players), then sued the PGA (depleting the PGA’s reserves)?  One justification I’ve heard for the deal was that the Saudis’ Public Investment Fund (PIF) was going to continue flooding their infinite wealth into golf anyway, so this was the PGA’s best possible outcome. But doesn’t that make this a hostile takeover?

Another justification is that the PIF is invested in lots of other businesses. Have I taken my last Uber?  I don’t think so. And I’ll add that if we don’t have morality clauses for other investors, why should we for them? But what’s next? Vladimir Putin buys the NFL? Kim Jong Un takes over the Yankees?

Yet another justification we’re given is that the PGA will retain control over the merged entity. I watched an interview where Jimmy Dunne (a PGA board member and one of the merger’s promoters) yelled into the camera that it’s “insane” for anyone to think the Saudis will run the PGA. But the PIF will be the PGA’s predominant investor and Yasir Al-Rumanyyan, the PIF Saudi powerbroker of the deal, will be the new entity’s Chairman of the Board. So, the money is Saudi and the Chairman of the Board is Saudi. With all due respect, Mr. Dunne, it would be insane NOT to think the Saudis will run the PGA.

A few more questions, but I’ll let Tom Watson ask them. Mr. Watson, one of the all-time greatest golfers and beloved golf figures, wrote an open letter to PGA Commissioner Jay Monahan where he asked Monahan directly:

  • Why was this deal done in such secrecy?
  • Why wasn’t even one of the players who sits on the Tour’s Policy Board included?
  • Are the Saudis the only viable rescue from the Tour’s financial problems?

I think they’re all great questions. Jay, what say you?

For me, there are three bottom lines:

Bottom Line #1:  The PGA is as American as apple pie. That Saudi Arabia now has such a stronghold on the PGA is astounding.

Bottom Line #2:  I can’t seem to root for LIV golfers. Without their defections, the PIF and LIV had no leverage over the PGA. I know, I know, it’s easy for me to take the moral high ground – no one’s offering me $200 million for my golf game. But weren’t the LIV golfers’ defections the catalyst that ended the PGA as we know it?

But then there’s Bottom Line #3, and this may be the most important: Rory McIlroy, one of golf’s biggest superstars, the PGA’s most ardent defender and LIV’s most ardent hater, said he’s resigned to the deal. And he even added that, in the long term, the deal will be good for golf. Damn, if Rory McIlroy, who was the sacrificial lamb in this deal, can accept it, how can I, Josephine Schmo, have a problem with it?

As you can probably tell, my head is spinning. I’m requesting, no, I’M BEGGING, for your thoughts.   What do you think about this?